Bind the proposal to one revision
Record the full commit under review, the flag key, the code or configuration path, its default, and the named human who owns the merge. If any of them changes, review the new revision rather than carrying the previous receipt forward.
The OpenFeature Flag Evaluation API defines typed evaluation with a flag key, default value, and optional evaluation context; its detailed form can return additional metadata. That specification does not establish your provider's target, a flag's actual value, or your release policy.
Review the behavior and fallback together
For the proposed change, write down the behavior that can change, the evaluation context class, the default value, and what happens when the value is unavailable. Observe the declared default in an approved environment. Do not infer that false, an empty string, or a default variant is safe: its meaning belongs to the use site.
Retain an owned disable path
Name the person who can disable the change, the procedure, and the verification step. A revert can be relevant, but a configuration change may also need a provider-specific disable action. The included local checker makes the missing-information gate reproducible:
npm test --prefix sites/odexing.com/evidence/P127
It does not parse a configuration, call a provider, prove targeting, observe a real customer, authorize a change, or execute the disable procedure. Use it to prepare the actual repository and environment review.
For a workflow-automation boundary, see Gate an Agent-Generated CI Workflow Change Before Merge. For an authorization diff, see Gate an Agent-Generated Authorization Change Before Merge.
Does a feature flag make an agent change safe to merge?
No. It can make a behavior selectable. The review still needs the exact change, default, affected behavior, environment observation, and human-owned recovery decision.